News last week that FEMA was asking a court for immunity from any financial responsibility related to Hurricane Katrina is downright laughable.
The Federal Emergency Mismanagement Agency (FEMA) dictated to the RV and manufactured housing industry the specifications for how emergency housing should be build. The agency ordered thousands of temporary homes and demanded that they be built as quickly as possible.
After the RV industry responded by building housing to FEMA's specifications in a very timely fashion -- some bottom-feeding attorneys saw an opportunity to sue any company or group that built RVs, ordered RVs, sold RVs, or had the letters RV in their name simply because an odorless gas was being emitted at levels for which there were no consistent federal standards.
Facing billions of dollars in potential liability, FEMA now smugly wants to be left off the hook for causing the whole mess in the first place. How typical.
If FEMA -- which ordered the units and dictated how they would be built -- can be let off the hook of financial responsibility, then certainly the companies that followed the FEMA standards should also be indemnified.
I've blogged on this before. The separation of powers provisions of our Constitution allow Congress to declare that certain topics are off-limits for federal courts to consider. If the courts grant indemnity to the agency that initiated the fiasco, then Congress should respond by granting indemnity to all the companies who complied with FEMA's instructions.
Let's end this disgusting example of federal oversight and move on confident in knowing that changes will be made to prevent similar situations in the future and that FEMA will be free to invent other ways to prove how inept the government really is in protecting and serving people facing genuine need.